ĭxO ViewPoint's volume distortion correction can be used to attempt to recover the natural proportions of objects that have been distorted due to their proximity to the edge of the frame when photographed with a wide-angle lens. DxO ViewPoint's corrections are based on DxO's data created through a large volume of images produced using different lens and camera combinations in DxO's laboratory. Lens distortions include barrel, pincushion, and fisheye. It functions as an independent application, as a plugin for DxO PhotoLab, and as an external editor for Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Lightroom, and Adobe Photoshop Elements.ĭxO ViewPoint allows users to correct the horizon, keystoning, volume distortion (volume anamorphosis), and a number of lens distortions automatically or through sliders. The software claims to be able to make precise corrections to lens flaws through its use of DxO's database of calibrations (called DxO Optics Modules) which have been created through laboratory tests.ĭxO ViewPoint exists for macOS and Windows computers. It is designed to automatically straighten distorted perspectives caused by the lens used and the position of the photographer. ( April 2022) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message)ĭxO ViewPoint is image geometry and lens defect correction software developed by DxO. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. It's the product I used to create the comparison Birds/No birds image, but of course many other products could do that, too.This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. I don't think it has many unique features, and isn't particularly easy to use, but it does a lot for the money and works well. I would have recommended Sharpen AI, but it seems to be at the end of its life.Īnd Affinity Photo is a good workhorse photo editor. Topaz Photo AI is also already good, and getting better every week. I'd prioritise ViewPoint over FilmPack, but it's better to have both. Although marketed as separate products, they're really collections of PhotoLab features that are already built into PL6, but only turned on if you buy those additional licences. They are solid performers, and add essential capabilities to PL6. If you're looking for something else to buy, I'd strongly recommend the current versions of DxO ViewPoint and FilmPack Elite. I think it's months since I last used it for real. Unless they add some extensions that are actually useful rather than gimmicky, I won't be renewing. And I find it frustrating and annoying to use, because I can never trust the AI to work properly, so have basically abandoned it. I'm not into sky replacement, which seems to be one of the few things it does fairly well, but I imagine there are other tools that do it better.Įvery feature seems second- or third-rate compared to the other tools I own. It's basically a toy with a few amusing party tricks, which look good in a video, but don't work very well in the real world. I have Luminar Neo (as well as the full Affinity 2 and Topaz AI suites), and find that Neo is by far the least-used of them. But definitely with $$$ spent on getting PhotoLab 6. May or may not try out Luminar Neo mulling that over. Oh, yes, it goes without saying that PL6 is superior to P元 in many other ways, too. What he didn't mention, was the noticeable improvement in image quality, with the same settings. Yeah, I would agree with Digital Nigel, that dust removal has improved over version 3. Just purchased & installed the latest PhotoLab 6. This other video by Scott Davenport covers the 2nd point: This video by Jim Nix illustrates the first point: You peaked my interest about Luminar Neo. But for real dust, the Neo Dust Removal tool is very good and fast. The tool in DxO PhotoLab 6 Elite is more powerful. Yes, the dust removal tool is designed to leave no dust "spots" like birds in Neo. Even when it works well, as here, I don't particularly like using it, and sometimes it works really badly (like the awful Clone tool). I have a full Neo licence with all extensions, but I must admit that I hardly ever use it. So, given that I have both products, I prefer the PL6 tool. However, I don't think you can selectively undo or adjust the edits with that tool, as you can with the PL6 ReTouch tool. Which Neo tool did you use? Not surprisingly, the Dust spot removal tool doesn't automatically remove the birds, so I suppose you used the general purpose Erase tool, which does it well, in much the same way as PL6 (just painting over each of the birds).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |